A July 2025 decision from the Third District Court of Appeal highlights the critical importance of timing in medical negligence cases. In Daisha Ervin v. Sergio A. Alvarez, M.D., et al., the court affirmed the dismissal of a malpractice complaint after finding the claimant failed to file within legal deadlines. If you believe you were harmed by medical treatment, you must consider both the discovery rule and the hard statute of limitations.
Medical malpractice claims in Florida must be filed within two years from the time the injury is or reasonably should be discovered, or within four years of the negligent act itself. In this case, the patient argued she only learned of the harm years after treatment. The court rejected that as a basis for extension because supporting evidence did not meet the legal threshold.
How the Court’s Ruling Reinforces Deadline Discipline
Your right to compensation depends not only on injury but also on procedural compliance. Florida’s statute requires timely action and allows limited exceptions when delayed discovery applies. However, the claimant cannot rely on vague or retrospective awareness. The court requires evidence that a reasonably diligent person could not have known of the harm earlier.
South Florida Personal Injury Lawyers Blog












